2025-26学年第2期总第879期高三II-III版答案与解析
Day 1
语篇分析
Main body:
Part 1 (Para 2): Historical background of the surname rule
Part 2 (Para 3): Growing public and political support for change
Part 3 (Para 4): The rule’s negative impact on women’s careers and workplace identity
Part 4 (Para 5): Broader benefits of reforming the surname rule
阅读理解 1-4 CACB
Day 2 词汇小测 1. was released 2. dominant 3. perception 4. prosperity
Day 3
语篇分析
Part 1 (Paras 1–2): A historic change at this year’s Wimbledon
Part 2 (Para 3): The debate caused by the Hawk-Eye system
Part 3 (Paras 4-6): The causes of Wimbledon’s issue
Part 4 (Para 7): Similar issues with other technologies
Part 5 (Para 8): Key questions about new technologies and possible solutions
阅读理解 1-4 CBAD
拓维思辨
A possible answer:
On the positive side, technology can make work faster and more accurate. For example, robots in factories can do repetitive tasks quickly without getting tired. But there are problems too. When machines take over jobs, people may lose work, which can be hard for families and communities. Also, automated systems, like those in customer service, may not understand emotions as well as humans, which can lead to frustration. Therefore, it is important to find a balance so that we can enjoy the benefits of technology without losing the human touch.
Day 4 阅读理解 1-4 DBBC
Day 5 1. most rewarding 2. into 3. because/since/for/as 4. naturally 5. convinced 6. appealing 7. a 8. winning 9. have built 10. but
答案解析：
Day 1 1-4 CACB
1. C。根据原文第二段 “The rule dates back to the country’s old Civil Code of 1898, which introduced a male-centered family system where a wife entered her husband’s family and therefore took his surname” 可知，日本姓氏规定源于 1898 年的旧民法典，该法典确立了男性为中心的家庭制度，因此其初衷是强化男性主导地位。
2. A。根据原文第三段 “In a 2024 poll by Japanese national broadcaster NHK, 62 percent of people asked said they favored allowing married couples to keep separate surnames. A 2025 Jiji Press survey found that a rising percentage of lawmakers ‑ about 44 percent ‑ also support having two surnames” 可知，近期民调显示多数民众及越来越多的议员支持夫妻保留各自姓氏，说明公众意见正朝着改革的方向转变。
3. C。根据原文第四段 “Linda E. White ... noted that some women worry that once their marital status changes, bosses and colleagues may not take their work as seriously as when they were single” 可知，White 认为一些职业女性担心婚后改姓会让老板和同事不再像对待单身时那样重视她们的工作，即可能降低她们的职业认可度。
4. B。根据原文最后一段 “A 2024 study from Tohoku University predicted that every person in Japan could have the surname ‘Sato’ in just over 500 years unless married couples are allowed to have separate surnames ... ‘lacking the diversity it needs to thrive into the future’” 可知，最后一段强调的担忧是，若不改革姓氏规定，日本可能因姓氏单一化而失去多样性，即面临文化单一化的风险。
Day 3 1-4 CBAD
1. C。根据原文第三段 “Russian player Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova had to replay a point she had clearly won, because Hawk-Eye failed to register that a ball had landed out” 以及第四段 “The new system promised more accuracy, but that didn’t automatically make it feel fair ... A machine’s mistake ... leads to frustration” 可知，Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova 的例子表明，AI判罚系统出现故障时，会导致明明赢球却要重赛的不公平情况。
2. B。根据原文第六段 “The problem at Wimbledon was not the technology itself but the way it was introduced. Hawk-Eye functioned well, but the tournament – and especially the players and fans – were not prepared” 以及第七段 “These systems are often introduced too quickly without enough testing” 可知，作者认为温网的主要问题并非技术本身，而是AI判罚系统引入得太快，相关人员并未做好准备。
3. A。根据原文第七段 “The same pattern is happening with AI and other new tools, such as customer service bots. These systems are often introduced too quickly without enough testing” 可知，作者提到 AI 和客服机器人时指出，这类系统常因引入过快、缺乏充分测试而出现问题，由此可推断作者认为它们在投入使用前应进行更多测试。
4. D。根据原文最后一段 “If we want technology to improve life, we can’t just replace people with machines. We need to rethink and redesign the institutions these systems are meant to serve, making use of the potential that new technology can offer” 可知，作者建议在实施新技术时，不应简单用机器替代人类，而是要重新思考并设计相关机构，以更好地整合新技术、发挥其潜力。
Day 4 1-4 DBBC
1. D。根据原文第一段 “I was 19, in love with literature ... But with a lack of life experience, exams and focusing on grades, I couldn’t truly appreciate them” 以及第二段 “I loved these books, but I didn’t really get them” 可知，作者 19 岁时热爱文学，但因缺乏生活经验无法真正理解经典，即觉得文学有趣但超出自己的理解范围。
2. B。根据原文第八段 “I told a friend to read it again, amazed by how good, how relevant it is, even though it was published in 1871” 可知，作者重读《米德尔马契》时，最惊讶的是这部 1871 年出版的作品依然出色、依然切题，其传达的信息仍能打动读者。
3. B。根据原文第九段 “Madame Bovary gives big social media vibes. Everyone else is having a better time than Bovary. Everyone’s grass is greener. Nothing lives up to her expectations” 可知，《包法利夫人》中 “他人生活更美好、自身期望屡屡落空” 的核心矛盾，与当下社交媒体环境中人们的普遍心态高度契合；第十段提到 “The Picture of Dorian Gray shows that our obsessions with youth and beauty are nothing new”，指出该书所探讨的 “对青春与美貌的痴迷”，在如今的自拍文化、社交媒体虚假形象中仍普遍存在。作者通过这两部经典作品，意在表明它们所涉及的主题并非过时，而是具有贴近当下生活的现代属性。
4. C。根据原文第十一段 “That’s why I recommend rereading. These authors understood something about humanity that still resonates ...” 以及第十二段 “Reading the classics is a way to reclaim something in danger of being lost ... ” 可知，作者通过讲述自己不同年龄段阅读经典的感受，重点强调了重读经典的价值，并明确推荐重读经典，因此其写作的主要目的是强调重读经典的价值。
返回列表
