2025-26学年第8期总第884期高三II-III版答案与解析
Day 1
语篇分析
Part 1 (Para 1): The Swedish Academy’s award announcement.
Part 2 (Para 2): Translator George Szirtes’ comment on Krasznahorkai.
Part 3 (Paras 3-4): Krasznahorkai’s life background.
Part 4 (Para 5): Krasznahorkai’s literary breakthrough.
Part 5 (Paras 6-8): Krasznahorkai’s unique writing style and themes and related comments.
Part 6 (Para 9): Academy member Steve Sem-Sandberg’s conclusive statement on the award.
阅读理解 1-4 CBBC
写作训练
Dear Mr White,
I’m writing on behalf of the World Literature Study Club to invite you to our book sharing session. In light of the recent Nobel Prize in Literature, many students have shown great interest in exploring contemporary writers, especially Laszlo Krasznahorkai, whose works are known for their depth and complexity. To promote deeper reading and cross-cultural understanding, we plan to hold a sharing session on his major novels and themes.
We would be most honored if you could join us and share your insights into Krasznahorkai’s distinctive writing style — particularly his long, flowing sentences and philosophical reflections on modern life. The event will take place next Wednesday afternoon in Room 301 of the library. We sincerely hope you can attend and make the discussion more meaningful.
Looking forward to your reply.
Sincerely,
Li Hua
Day 2
阅读理解 1-4 BCDD
Day 3
阅读理解 1-4 BADC
Day 4
阅读理解 1-4 BCCB
Day 5 1-5 EFGAD
答案解析：
Day 1 1-4 CBBC
1. C。根据原文第一段 “The academy honored him for his ‘compelling and visionary’ works, which uphold the power of art in the midst of ‘apocalyptic terror’” 可知，瑞典文学院表彰他是因为其作品在 “末日般的恐惧” 中捍卫了艺术的力量，即 “在绝望中坚守对艺术的信念”。
2. B。根据原文第四段 “In the 1980s, Krasznahorkai spent many years traveling around Hungary and Germany ... These unusual experiences appear in many of his novels. In the late 1990s, his travels took him to Mongolia, China and Japan, whose cultures he has also explored in his works” 可知，他在匈牙利、德国、蒙古、中国、日本等地的旅行经历，其文化与生活体验都被融入作品中，说明他从全球各地的经历中汲取创作灵感。
3. B。根据原文第六段 “his unique writing style, marked by long, flowing sentences that sometimes continue for pages with hardly any punctuation”（句式长且流畅，常几页无标点，体现复杂性）和第七段 “his style also allows for a lightness of touch and a great lyrical beauty”（兼具灵动质感与抒情美感，类似音乐的韵律感）可知，他的写作风格 “复杂却富有音乐性”。
4. C。根据原文最后一段 “... artistic gaze, which is entirely free of illusion and which sees through the fragility of the social order, combined with his unwavering belief in the power of art” 可知，瑞典文学院认为他的 “艺术视角” 不受幻想蒙蔽，能看透社会秩序的脆弱（揭露真相），同时又坚定相信艺术的力量（肯定希望）。
Day 2 1-4 BCDD
1. B。根据原文第一段 “the Nobel Prize in physics went to three scientists for showing that the special properties of the quantum world can be made concrete in a system big enough to be held in your hand” 以及第四段 “proved that quantum tunneling can also occur on a macroscopic scale, involving many particles” 可知，今年诺贝尔奖得主的成就在于证明量子世界的特殊属性（如量子隧穿效应）能在宏观尺度（足够大、可手持的系统）中显现，即把量子效应扩大到了可见的尺度。
2. C。根据原文第三段 “a regular ball is made up of lots of particles and doesn’t show quantum effects ... But a single particle might sometimes pass through a barrier in its microscopic world and appear on the other side. This is a quantum mechanical phenomenon called tunneling” 可知，作者提到普通球的例子，是为了对比宏观物体（球）遵循经典物理规律、不显现量子效应，与微观粒子（能发生隧穿效应）遵循量子力学规律的不同表现，清晰区分经典行为与量子行为的差异。
3. D。根据原文第六段 “Initially, the experiment had no voltage ... Without the effects of quantum mechanics, this state would not change. Suddenly, a voltage appeared ... What happened in the experiment was macroscopic quantum tunneling” 可知，实验中初始无电压，在量子力学效应作用下出现了电压变化，而这一变化正是宏观量子隧穿效应导致的，即实验将电压变化与隧穿效应关联了起来。
4. D。根据原文最后一段 “The Nobel Committee for Physics said this research has laid the groundwork for the next generation of quantum technologies, including quantum cryptography, quantum computers and quantum sensors” 可知，这项研究为量子加密术、量子计算机等下一代量子技术奠定了基础，意味着它搭建了量子理论（宏观量子效应的证明）与实际应用（各类量子技术）之间的桥梁。
Day 3 1-4 BADC
1. B。根据原文前两段，先提出 “科学家通过‘开放科学’建立公众信任” 这一普遍做法（即大众的潜在假设），随后第三段作者以科学哲学与公共政策研究者的身份明确反驳 ——“some forms of openness can actually reduce trust”（某些开放形式反而会降低信任）。作者通过挑战 “开放必然提升信任” 的固有假设引出主题，而非定义概念（A）、对比观点（C）或举例（D）。
2. A。根据原文第四段，2009年气候科学家邮件遭泄露后，尽管调查证明科学家无不当行为，但 “泄露数据缺乏背景信息，催生了阴谋论”，最终影响公众信任。结合前文作者观点 “某些开放形式会降低信任” 可知，该案例是为了说明：仅暴露部分信息（无完整背景的邮件）这种 “片面开放”，反而会损害公众对科学的信任。
3. D。根据原文第六段 “lying only works if no one finds out ... The idea of a noble lie is what I call a fake solution. It doesn’t really fix the problem” 可知，作者认为 “高尚的谎言” 本质是欺骗，且真相终将暴露，既无法真正解决信任问题，在原则上也是错误的（撒谎违背诚信），在效果上更是无效的（无法修复信任）。
4. C。根据原文最后两段 “Scientists aren’t completely fair or neutral ... science doesn’t prove things for sure. It makes the best guesses based on facts and data” 以及 “they haven’t done a great job of explaining that to the public ... we need to help them really understand how it works” 可知，作者认为科学家应向公众清晰承认科学的局限性（非绝对完美、结论基于事实推测），而非隐瞒不足。
Day 4 1-4 BCCB
1. B。根据原文第一段作者父亲的话 “You’re never going to be as fluent as a native speaker” 可知，父亲认为作者永远无法像母语者一样流利，核心是觉得学习语言没有价值、不值得做。
2. C。根据原文第三段数据 “Back in 1997, over 80 percent of boys and 70 percent of girls studied a language at GCSE. By 2018, that fell to about half of girls and less than 40 percent of boys” 可知，1997 年至 2018 年，英国学习语言的 GCSE 学生比例大幅下降（男孩从 80% 以上降至 40% 以下，女孩从 70% 降至 50% 左右），直接表明 “学习语言的学生变少了”
3. C。根据原文第四段 “One reason is that the 2004 Labour government removed the requirement to take a language at GCSE ... Worse, language learning is once again becoming something mostly for rich families. In poorer areas, less than half of students study a language at GCSE, while in richer areas the number is about 20 percent higher” 可知，2004 年教育改革取消 GCSE 语言必修要求后，语言学习逐渐成为富裕家庭的 “专属”，贫富地区学生学习比例差距达 20%，即扩大了社会阶层间的差距。
4. B。根据原文第六段作者强调学习语言的多重价值（培养韧性、创造力，增加就业机会，延缓阿尔茨海默病），以及第七段 “Britain is not as monolingual as it thinks ... Immigrants bring their languages ... Celtic languages too. Embracing this multilingual reality could strengthen both our society and our global ties” 可知，作者认为英国本身存在丰富的多语言资源（移民语言、凯尔特语言），且多语言能力对个人和社会都有重要意义，本质是在传递 “多语言能力是国家宝贵资源” 的观点。
Day 5 1-5 EFGAD
1. E。根据前文 “我之前写过如何加快任务进度”，以及后文 “这样做时，你就不太可能逃避任务，能更快完成且压力更小”，可知空格处需衔接 “加快任务进度” 与 “减少逃避、降低压力” 的关联。选项 E 提到 “减轻任务的情感负担”，既呼应了前文 “加快进度” 的话题，又能解释后文 “减少逃避、压力变小” 的原因 —— 情感负担减轻后，任务更易推进。
2. F。本段主题是 “将任务视为独立个体”，前文指出 “若2小时任务是长达一个月项目的一部分，会感觉繁重”，空格处需转折说明 “独立看待任务” 的效果。选项 F 中 “想象成独立任务” 直接呼应段落主题 “standalone”，且 “感觉简单得多” 与前文 “感觉繁重” 形成对比，逻辑连贯。
3. G。本段主题是 “降低风险（减轻压力）”，后文举例 “写一封邮件时，总觉得这是建立友谊或获得回复的唯一机会”，说明人们易夸大单一任务的重要性。选项 G 提到 “想象任务能决定一切而增加压力”，恰好解释了后文例子中 “压力的来源”，且与 “降低风险” 的主题呼应 —— 只有先意识到 “夸大任务重要性会增压”，才能 “降低风险”。
4. A。根据后文 “有时任务感觉繁重是因为你投入了太多个人情感”“把它看作简单的交换：到场、完成要求、获得回报、继续前进”“并非所有任务都需要你全身心投入或充满热情”，可知本段核心是 “减少任务中的个人情感投入”。选项 A“当作公事，而非私事” 直接概括了这一观点，且与后文 “简单交换”“无需全情投入” 形成呼应。
5. D。本段主题是 “拿出‘普通的自己’”，前文提到 “并非所有任务都需要做到最好，有时完成就足以让人印象深刻，即使是‘普通的自己’也能做好”，空格处需总结 “普通状态完成任务” 的意义。选项 D “完成任务本身就是成就” 既呼应了 “无需做到最好，完成即可” 的观点，又能给人积极心理暗示，符合 “让任务变轻松” 的核心目标。
返回列表
